Confidence Intervals for Proportions and Related Measures of Effect Size

By Robert Newcombe. 2012

116 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5dcd1a92d3e6d18d475b459df372702ec33a1baf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Statistics and Probability

1. Andrew S. Rosen
2. M. Thulin

Citations in the corpus

• Correlations, trends and potential biases among publicly accessible web-based student evaluations of teaching: a large-scale study of RateMyProfessors.com data (2018, methodology): “The Mann–Whitney U values along with effect size estimates and 95% confidence intervals based on the methods described by Newcombe (2012) are shown in Table S1 of the Supplemental data.”
• The cost of using exact confidence intervals for a binomial proportion (2013, methodology): “The Wald interval suffers from particularly erratic coverage properties, and cannot be recommended for general use [5, 20].”