Guidelines for developing, translating, and validating a questionnaire in perioperative and pain medicine
By Siny Tsang, Colin Royse, A. Terkawi. Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia, 2017
1,340 citations recorded by the source corpus.
The task of developing a new questionnaire or translating an existing questionnaire into a different language might be overwhelming. The greatest challenge perhaps is to come up with a questionnaire that is psychometrically sound, and is efficient and effective for use in research and clinical settings. This article provides guidelines for the development and translation of questionnaires for application in medical fields, with a special emphasis on perioperative and pain medicine. We provide a framework to guide researchers through the various stages of questionnaire development and translation. To ensure that the questionnaires are psychometrically sound, we present a number of statistical methods to assess the reliability and validity of the questionnaires.
Subfields: Pharmacology, Sociology and Political Science, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5dcd19aba1a9956aba5a10121e6aa74c4dbdf4d2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- V. Nikopoulou
- E. Spyridopoulou
- C. Varvara
- S. Sakka
- V. Tsipropoulou
- S. Kostikidou
- E. Parlapani
- V. Holeva
Citations in the corpus
- Psychometric Properties of the Greek Version of FCV-19S (2020, methodology): “The adaptation process was developed in relation to the principal guidelines (Sousa and Rojjanasrirat 2011; Tsang et al. 2017; World Health Organization 2009).”