Proximal Alternating Minimization and Projection Methods for Nonconvex Problems: An Approach Based on the Kurdyka-Lojasiewicz Inequality

By Hédy Attouch, Jérôme Bolte, Patrick Redont, Antoine Soubeyran. 2008

1,445 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We study the convergence properties of an alternating proximal minimization algorithm for nonconvex structured functions of the type: L(x,y)=f(x)+Q(x,y)+g(y), where f and g are proper lower semicontinuous functions, defined on Euclidean spaces, and Q is a smooth function that couples the variables x and y. The algorithm can be viewed as a proximal regularization of the usual Gauss-Seidel method to minimize L. We work in a nonconvex setting, just assuming that the function L satisfies the Kurdyka-Łojasiewicz inequality. An entire section illustrates the relevancy of such an assumption by giving examples ranging from semialgebraic geometry to “metrically regular” problems. Our main result can be stated as follows: If L has the Kurdyka-Łojasiewicz property, then each bounded sequence generated by the algorithm converges to a critical point of L. This result is completed by the study of the convergence rate of the algorithm, which depends on the geometrical properties of the function L around its critical points. When specialized to $Q(x,y)=\Vert x-y \Vert ^2$ and to f, g indicator functions, the algorithm is an alternating projection mehod (a variant of von Neumann's) that converges for a wide class of sets including semialgebraic and tame sets, transverse smooth manifolds or sets with “regular” intersection. To illustrate our results with concrete problems, we provide a convergent proximal reweighted l1 algorithm for compressive sensing and an application to rank reduction problems.

Subfields: Computational Mechanics, Mathematical Physics, Numerical Analysis

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Mechanics

  1. Wotao Yin
  2. Thomas Pock
  3. Jason D. Lee
  4. Michael I. Jordan
  5. Francis R. Bach
  6. Ting Kei Pong
  7. Peter Richtárik
  8. Stephen J. Wright

In Mathematical Physics

  1. Thomas Pock
  2. Wotao Yin
  3. Ting Kei Pong
  4. Guoyin Li
  5. Pascal Bianchi
  6. Anas Barakat
  7. Hédy Attouch
  8. Nicholas G. Polson

In Numerical Analysis

  1. Thomas Pock
  2. Wotao Yin
  3. Ting Kei Pong
  4. Guoyin Li
  5. Ernö Robert Csetnek
  6. Hédy Attouch
  7. Yangyang Xu
  8. Stephen J. Wright

Citations in the corpus