Economic Efficiency of One Cycle of Marker‐Assisted Selection
By L. Moreau, Stéphane Lemarié, Alain Charcosset, A. Gallais. 2000
91 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Genetics, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5dc570bedeaf1d0eb791b8a3a2c3ff1f0c5b17e0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Genetics
- M. Sorrells
- Jean-Luc Jannink
- K. Semagn
- P. Langridge
- Jeffrey B. Endelman
- Y. Beyene
- Xuecai Zhang
- G. Atlin
In Plant Science
- M. Sorrells
- Jean-Luc Jannink
- Jim Holland
- K. Semagn
- Pankaj Kumar Gupta
- R R Mir
- P. Langridge
- Jeffrey B. Endelman
Citations in the corpus
- Genetic and Economic Analysis of a Targeted Marker-assisted Wheat Breeding Strategy (2005, background): “In another example, Moreau et al. (2000) concluded that the relative cost efficiency of MAS was largely reliant on the genetic foundation of the traits under selection, but also acknowledged that improvements in molecular marker technology could also make MAS more economically attractive.”
- Marker-assisted wheat breeding: present status and future possibilities (2010, methodology): “Therefore, computer simulations have been used to design genetically effective and economically viable marker-assisted breeding strategies in several crops including wheat (Hospital et al. 1997; Knapp 1998; Charmet et al. 1999; Moreau et al. 2000; Kuchel et al. 2005).”
- Money matters (I): costs of field and laboratory procedures associated with conventional and marker-assisted maize breeding at CIMMYT (2003, background): “Currently, little information is publicly available concerning the costs of phenotypic and genotypic selection procedures, and few papers have addressed this issue (Moreau et al. 2000; Ragot and Hoisington 1993; Yu et al. 2000).”
- Optimal Design of Preliminary Yield Trials with Genome-Wide Markers (2014, methodology): “Earlier treatments of resource allocation with markers have focused on traditional marker-assisted selection, using an index that combines phenotype with a molecular prediction based on a small number of significant markers (Lande and Thompson, 1990; Knapp, 1998; Xie and Xu, 1998; Moreau et al., 200”
- Comparison of phenotypic and marker-based selection for Fusarium head blight resistance and DON content in spring wheat (2007, background): “Different theoretical studies have shown that marker-assisted selection (MAS) in this situation may have the potential to achieve higher selection gains than phenotypic selection (Hospital et al. 1997; Moreau et al. 2000).”
- Implementation of molecular markers for quantitative traits in breeding programs - challenges and opportunities (2004, background): “Once the effort has been expended to collect good phenotypic data and improve the trait heritability, however, phenotypic selection based on family mean values will also be highly effective (Dekkers and Hospital 2002; Moreau et al. 2000; van Berloo and Stam 1998).”
- Diagnostic DNA markers for cereal cyst nematode resistance in bread wheat (2001, methodology): “phenotypic selection have been widely reported using simulations (Lande and Thompson 1990; Hospital et al. 1997; Moreau et al. 2000).”
- Experimental evaluation of several cycles of marker-assisted selection in maize (2004, result): “…theoretical studies have shown the relative interest and limits of such an approach compared to conventional selection (Zhang & Smith, 1992, 1993; Gimelfarb & Lande, 1994; Whittaker et al., 1995, 1997; Moreau et al., 1998, 2000; Charmet et al., 1999; Hospital et al., 2000; Lange & Whittaker, 2001).”