Camera Trapping for Wildlife Research
By F. Rovero, F. Zimmermann. 2016
230 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Aerospace Engineering, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Media Technology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5db180c5bf1080c0d206adecc4562eaa745d04f1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Aerospace Engineering
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
In Media Technology
Citations in the corpus
- A review of factors to consider when using camera traps to study animal behavior to inform wildlife ecology and conservation (2020, unknown): “There is considerable variation in the physical design, structure, and technical specifications of CT models (Rovero, Zimmermann, Berzi, & Meek, 2013; Rovero & Zimmermann, 2016; Trolliet et al., 2014).”
- A review of camera trapping for conservation behaviour research (2017, background): “CTs are increasingly popular in ecological 92 studies (Burton et al. 2015; Rovero and Zimmermann 2016) and provide a wealth of 93 information that is often of considerable conservation value (e.”
- Distance sampling with camera traps (2017, methodology): “…of the trigger speed, the effective horizontal angle of the sensor relative to the AOV of the camera (which varies among CT models) and possibly reduced sensitivity of the sensor at the periphery of its horizontal range (Rowcliffe et al. 2011; Rovero et al. 2013; Rovero & Zimmermann 2016).”