Is the Random Access Channel of LTE and LTE-A Suitable for M2M Communications? A Survey of Alternatives

By Andres Laya, L. Alonso, J. Alonso-Zarate. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 2014

586 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The 3GPP has raised the need to revisit the design of next generations of cellular networks in order to make them capable and efficient to provide M2M services. One of the key challenges that has been identified is the need to enhance the operation of the random access channel of LTE and LTE-A. The current mechanism to request access to the system is known to suffer from congestion and overloading in the presence of a huge number of devices. For this reason, different research groups around the globe are working towards the design of more efficient ways of managing the access to these networks in such circumstances. This paper aims to provide a survey of the alternatives that have been proposed over the last years to improve the operation of the random access channel of LTE and LTE-A. A comprehensive discussion of the different alternatives is provided, identifying strengths and weaknesses of each one of them, while drawing future trends to steer the efforts over the same shooting line. In addition, while existing literature has been focused on the performance in terms of delay, the energy efficiency of the access mechanism of LTE will play a key role in the deployment of M2M networks. For this reason, a comprehensive performance evaluation of the energy efficiency of the random access mechanism of LTE is provided in this paper. The aim of this computer-based simulation study is to set a baseline performance upon which new and more energy-efficient mechanisms can be designed in the near future.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5db0590ecb3708b46dbf95da65b5ff29613457ce

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

  1. Shree Krishna Sharma
  2. Robert Schober
  3. Zhen Gao
  4. Hsiao-Hwa Chen
  5. Jean-Marie Gorce
  6. Claire Goursaud
  7. Mahyar Shirvanimoghaddam
  8. Fayezeh Ghavimi

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

  1. Robert Schober
  2. Hsiao-Hwa Chen
  3. Petar Popovski
  4. Shree Krishna Sharma
  5. Mohammad Mahdi Azari
  6. Zhen Gao
  7. Min Chen
  8. Wei Yu

Citations in the corpus