Challenging the tragedy of the commons in root competition: confounding effects of neighbour presence and substrate volume
By M. Semchenko, M. Hutchings, E. John. 2007
140 citations recorded by the source corpus.
1 It has been claimed that, compared with plants grown without competition, plants competing for a common pool of soil‐based resources overproduce roots at the expense of reproduction (known as the tragedy of the commons). However, experiments on this phenomenon have manipulated not only the presence/absence of neighbours, but also substrate volume. Restricted substrate volume can itself affect plant growth, possibly through chemical self‐inhibition of root growth. We conducted an experiment with oats (Avena sativa) to examine whether the experimental design used in previous studies on the tragedy of the commons in root competition might have confounded the effects of detection of neighbours and substrate volume. 2 Six treatments combined two factors, namely the presence or absence of activated carbon, and either the presence of a plastic or a mesh partition, or the absence of a partition, between two plants in a pot. Activated carbon was used to adsorb root exudates and reduce their potential effects on root growth. In a seventh treatment, plants were grown alone in pots with half the substrate volume replaced by gravel, to fragment the distribution of available resources. 3 We observed no tragedy of the commons in a comparison of the performance of plants grown with and without partitions; plants performed equally well in the presence and absence of root competition. 4 In the treatment with gravel, plants displayed reduced tillering and shoot growth per unit root mass, and an earlier switch to reproduction. 5 Pot partitioning was associated with inhibition of root growth that was mediated by root exudates. When activated carbon was present, plants in partitioned pots performed better than plants growing with a root competitor. 6 We conclude that two processes could determine plant growth in the experimental design used in studies of the tragedy of the commons: (i) greater root self‐inhibition in the more limited space of partitioned pots, and (ii) inefficient root placement in larger substrate volumes in unpartitioned pots that are shared with roots of a competitor. These findings provide a new challenge for experimental designs attempting to demonstrate the role of self/non‐self discrimination in root competition.
Subfields: Agronomy and Crop Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5dafeb1c334a71746772a73ea174ed28b4e06e03
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Agronomy and Crop Science
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
In Plant Science
Citations in the corpus
- Games roots play: effects of soil volume and nutrients (2008, background): “The works of Hess & de Kroon (2007), Semchenko et al. (2007), and others point to the need to consider space and volume explicitly.”
- Effects of rooting volume and nutrient availability as an alternative explanation for root self/non‐self discrimination (2007, methodology): “From studies in which the confounded factors were separated and root biomass was measured, in particular McConnaughay & Bazzaz (1991) and Loh et al. (2003), it is clear that there is an effect of volume on root mass that is independent of nutrients (see also Semchenko et al. 2007).”
- Predicting field performance of five irrigated tree species using seedling quality assessment in Burkina Faso, West Africa (2009, background): “…length tended to be greater in sand than in nursery substrate, indicating that plants responded to this nutrient-poor substrate by producing a more finely divided root system, providing a greater surface area for uptake of nutrients (Balisky et al. 1995; Osmont et al. 2007; Semchenko et al. 2007).”