Predicting carbon dioxide and energy fluxes across global FLUXNET sites with regression algorithms

By G. Tramontana, Martin Jung, C. Schwalm, K. Ichii, Gustau Camps-Valls, B. Raduly, Markus Reichstein, M. A. Arain, Alessandro Cescatti, G. Kiely and 5 more. 2016

715 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract. Spatio-temporal fields of land–atmosphere fluxes derived from data-driven models can complement simulations by process-based land surface models. While a number of strategies for empirical models with eddy-covariance flux data have been applied, a systematic intercomparison of these methods has been missing so far. In this study, we performed a cross-validation experiment for predicting carbon dioxide, latent heat, sensible heat and net radiation fluxes across different ecosystem types with 11 machine learning (ML) methods from four different classes (kernel methods, neural networks, tree methods, and regression splines). We applied two complementary setups: (1) 8-day average fluxes based on remotely sensed data and (2) daily mean fluxes based on meteorological data and a mean seasonal cycle of remotely sensed variables. The patterns of predictions from different ML and experimental setups were highly consistent. There were systematic differences in performance among the fluxes, with the following ascending order: net ecosystem exchange (R2   0.6), gross primary production (R2> 0.7), latent heat (R2 > 0.7), sensible heat (R2 > 0.7), and net radiation (R2 > 0.8). The ML methods predicted the across-site variability and the mean seasonal cycle of the observed fluxes very well (R2 > 0.7), while the 8-day deviations from the mean seasonal cycle were not well predicted (R2

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5da7d71daef7821fefb1e1f3e86e52add5813a38

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

  1. Martin Jung
  2. Markus Reichstein
  3. Ying Ping Wang
  4. Christian Frankenberg
  5. Gustau Camps-Valls
  6. B. Poulter
  7. Philippe Ciais
  8. Dario Papale

Citations in the corpus