The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire.

1,908 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Psychometric properties of the TSK‐11: A shortened version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (2005, background): “The samples reported moderate levels of pain intensity (Collins et al., 1997) and disability (Roland and Fairbank, 2000).”
Randomized Clinical Trial of Lumbar Instrumented Fusion and Cognitive Intervention and Exercises in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain and Disc Degeneration (2003, methodology): “0) was used to evaluate condition-specific disability and pain.(14,15) This score has 10 questions about pain and pain-related disability in activities of daily life and social participation.”
Reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale for disability in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain (2008, background): “Assessment of disability is most often done with multi-item instruments, that is, instruments measuring multiple activities which make up the construct of disability (Heijden et al., 2000; Roland and Fairbank, 2000).”
Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales. (2008, methodology): “Three commonly used HRQOLs are pain scales, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) [1–3], and the physical component summary (PCS) of the Short Form of the Medical Outcomes Study (SF-36) [4].”