Gaussian binning: a new kernel-based method for processing NMR spectroscopic data for metabolomics

By Paul E. Anderson, Nicholas V. Reo, Nicholas J. DelRaso, Travis E. Doom, Michael L. Raymer. Metabolomics, 2008

80 citations recorded by the source corpus.

In many metabolomics studies, NMR spectra are divided into bins of fixed width. This spectral quantification technique, known as uniform binning, is used to reduce the number of variables for pattern recognition techniques and to mitigate effects from variations in peak positions; however, shifts in peaks near the boundaries can cause dramatic quantitative changes in adjacent bins due to non-overlapping boundaries. Here we describe a new Gaussian binning method that incorporates overlapping bins to minimize these effects. A Gaussian kernel weights the signal contribution relative to distance from bin center, and the overlap between bins is controlled by the kernel standard deviation. Sensitivity to peak shift was assessed for a series of test spectra where the offset frequency was incremented in 0.5 Hz steps. For a 4 Hz shift within a bin width of 24 Hz, the error for uniform binning increased by 150%, while the error for Gaussian binning increased by 50%. Further, using a urinary metabolomics data set (from a toxicity study) and principal component analysis (PCA), we showed that the information content in the quantified features was equivalent for Gaussian and uniform binning methods. The separation between groups in the PCA scores plot, measured by the J2 quality metric, is as good or better for Gaussian binning versus uniform binning. The Gaussian method is shown to be robust in regards to peak shift, while still retaining the information needed by classification and multivariate statistical techniques for NMR-metabolomics data.

Subfields: Analytical Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5d8bed52e6c68ea74f0751ed940d77fb09b6124b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Analytical Chemistry

  1. Robert Powers
  2. Bradley Worley

In Biomedical Engineering

  1. Robert Powers
  2. Bradley Worley

In Molecular Biology

  1. Robert Powers
  2. Bradley Worley

Citations in the corpus