Comparison of Semantic Similarity for Different Languages Using the Google n-gram Corpus and Second-Order Co-occurrence Measures
By Colette Joubarne, Diana Inkpen. 2011
50 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Natural Language Processing, Computational Linguistics & Semantics
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Natural Language Processing
- José Camacho-Collados
- Mohammad Taher Pilehvar
- Ivan Vulic
- Sebastian Ruder
- Roberto Navigli
- Anders Søgaard
- Nigel Collier
- Luke S. Zettlemoyer
In Computational Linguistics & Semantics
- José Camacho-Collados
- Mohammad Taher Pilehvar
- Anders Søgaard
- Roberto Navigli
- Radu Soricut
- Ivan Vulic
- Franz Joseph Och
- Sebastian Ruder
Citations in the corpus
- A Survey of Cross-lingual Word Embedding Models (2017, background): “Extending them to the multilingual setting then mainly involves translating the word pairs into different languages: WordSim-353 has been translated to Spanish, Romanian, and Arabic (Hassan & Mihalcea, 2009) and to German, Italian, and Russian (Leviant & Reichart, 2015); RG was translated to German ”
- Unsupervised Morphology Induction Using Word Embeddings (2015, methodology): “For French we use the RG65 French version (Joubarne and Inkpen, 2011); for Spanish, Romanian, and Arabic we use their respective versions of WS353 (Hassan and Mihalcea, 2009).”
- SemEval-2017 Task 2: Multilingual and Cross-lingual Semantic Word Similarity (2017, background): “, 2002) datasets have been translated into other languages, either by experts (Gurevych, 2005; Joubarne and Inkpen, 2011; Granada et al., 2014; CamachoCollados et al., 2015), or by means of crowdsourcing (Leviant and Reichart, 2015), thereby creating equivalent datasets in languages other than Engli”