The cost of policy inaction : the case of not meeting the 2010 biodiversity target
By L. Braat, P. T. Brink, T. Klok. 2008
195 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5d793e101b7be3bde952d36f146ec6ade8b8bc2e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- B. Martín‐López
- M. García-Llorente
- Alfred J. Wagtendonk
- Peter H. Verburg
- Samer M. I. Hussein
- C. Montes
- A. McVittie
- C. López-Santiago
Citations in the corpus
- The ecosystem services agenda:bridging the worlds of natural science and economics, conservation and development, and public and private policy (2012, background): “In The Netherlands, in the context of regional planning, Van der Maarel and Dauvellier (1978) produced a classification of functions of nature, and Braat et al. (1979) published an ecological-economic analysis, using the term functions of the natural environment, initiated by WWF, with statements su”
- The role of multi-functionality in social preferences toward semi-arid rural landscapes: An ecosystem service approach (2012, background): “In this sense, it is suggested that ecosystems with certain degrees of extensive human management, particularly in the Mediterranean region, could reach a peak of services diversity (Braat and ten Brink, 2008; Bugalho et al., 2011; Gómez-Sal, 2007; Haines-Young, 2009; Schneiders et al., 2011).”
- Ecosystem service values for mangroves in Southeast Asia: A meta-analysis and value transfer applicatio (2012, methodology): “3 This baseline scenario has previously been used to assess the cost of policy inaction to halt global biodiversity loss (Braat and ten Brink, 2008).”