Sovereign Bonds and the “Democratic Advantage”: Does Regime Type Affect Credit Rating Agency Ratings in the Developing World?

By Candace C. Archer, G. Biglaiser, Karl Derouen. International Organization, 2007

178 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Finance

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5d71eb16eb6143646fd23ab0a544334e16d3bb03

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Joseph L. Staats
2. Mark L. J. Wright
3. Michael Tomz
4. G. Biglaiser
5. J. Hatchondo
6. Leonardo Martinez
7. Yoram Z. Haftel

In Finance

1. Michael Tomz
2. Mark L. J. Wright
3. Joseph L. Staats
4. G. Biglaiser
5. J. Hatchondo
6. Leonardo Martinez
7. Christoph Trebesch

Citations in the corpus

• Empirical Research on Sovereign Debt and Default (2013, background): “Archer, Biglaiser, and DeRouen (2007) claim that democracies do not enjoy higher credit ratings, but Beaulieu, Cox, and Saiegh (2012) find the opposite.”
• Finding the “Democratic Advantage” in Sovereign Bond Ratings: The Importance of Strong Courts, Property Rights Protection, and the Rule of Law (2012, methodology): “…2008+ See Vaaler and McNamara 2004; Vaaler, Schrage, and Block 2006; and Block and Vaaler 2004, who also use World Bank economic measures+ 69+ See Archer, Biglaiser, and DeRouen 2007; and Biglaiser and DeRouen 2007+ 70+ Block and Vaaler 2004, 925+ 71+ Data come from Standard and Poor’s…”