Two numerical models for landslide dynamic analysis

By Oldrich Hungr, Scott McDougall. Computational Geosciences, 2009

415 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5d53d08a45acc2e2f50c1da88ca952028b8bf7d0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. D. Schneider
2. J. Caplan‐Auerbach
3. M. Christen
4. C. Huggel
5. B. McArdell
6. P. Bartelt

Citations in the corpus

• Insights into rock-ice avalanche dynamics by combined analysis of seismic recordings and a numerical avalanche model (2010, background): “In their model DAN the erosion 6 of 20 rate increases in proportion to the flow depth [Hungr and McDougall, 2009; McDougall and Hungr, 2005].”
• r.avaflow v1, an advanced open-source computational framework for the propagation and interaction of two-phase mass flows (2016, neutral): “…Iverson (2012) The available entrainment models are effectively single phase and developed for bulk debris (Armanini et al., 2009; Crosta et al., 2009; Hungr and McDougall, 2009; Pirulli and Pastor, 2012) Whilst the importance of erosion and the associated change of the basal topography…”