An aggregation framework to link indicators associated with multifunctional land use to the stakeholder evaluation of policy options

By M. Paracchini, C. Pacini, M. Jones, M. Pérez-Soba. 2011

231 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Building and Construction, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5d51bb48c7dcf444512dc882c0f5424ac6df0d1e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. G. Martin
2. J. Ryschawy
3. M. Moraine
4. M. Magne
5. Masayasu Asai
6. J. Sarthou
7. Michel Duru
8. Lars Koschke

Citations in the corpus

• A quantitative review of relationships between ecosystem services (2014, background): “Due to functional trade-offs and synergies among the different components of this multi-functionality within the land, a decision potentially influences which services people can get or lose at the same time (Wiggering et al., 2006; Paracchini et al., 2011).”
• Crop–livestock integration beyond the farm level: a review (2016, background): “(Paracchini et al. 2011; van Ittersum et al. 2008).”
• A multi-criteria approach for an integrated land-cover-based assessment of ecosystem services provision to support landscape planning (2012, background): “…is an important part in studies related to ecosystem services and sustainable land use development (Hein et al., 2006; König et al., 2010; Menzel and Teng, 2009; Paracchini et al., 2009; Sheppard and Meitner, 2005) this requirement can be difficult to accomplish, at least from our experience.”