Do you not like Pigou, or do you not understand him? Tax aversion and revenue recycling in the lab

By Steffen Kallbekken, Stephan Kroll, Todd L. Cherry. 2011

255 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5d4f6c040df7c8a22212c83976e865961865ade9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. S. Carattini
2. Thomas Douenne
3. A. Fabre
4. A. Baranzini

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. Thomas Douenne
2. S. Carattini
3. A. Fabre
4. A. Baranzini

Citations in the corpus

• Effectiveness, earmarking and labeling: testing the acceptability of carbon taxes with survey data (2017, background): “Since most people fail to understand the difference between Pigouvian and Ramsey taxes and thus perceive environmental taxes as a mean to raise more revenues (Kallbekken et al. 2011), they may be willing to give up some of their income only if the use of revenues is clearly made explicit.”
• French attitudes on climate change, carbon taxation and other climate policies (2020, background): “As people tend to see carbon taxation as effective only if it finances green investments (Sælen & Kallbekken, 2011), these policies legitimize the implementation of a tax and increase its acceptance.”