Spatial regulation of the gap gene giant during Drosophila development.

By Rachel Kraut, Michael S. Levine. 1991

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Discovery of functional elements in 12 Drosophila genomes using evolutionary signatures (2007, background): “Several of the predicted regulatory connections have independent experimental support (Supplementary Table 5h), including direct regulation of achaete by Hairy 115 , of giant by Bicoid 116 , of Enhancer of split complex genes by Suppressor of Hairless 117 , and of bagpipe by Tinman (known to coopera”
Autonomous concentration-dependent activation and repression of Krüppel by hunchback in the Drosophila embryo. (1994, background): “The formally inferred repression effect of bcd on Kr was found to be mediated by gt (Kraut and Levine, 1991; Eldon and Pirotta, 1991) and the secondary repression effect of bcd on the zygotic hb expression was found to be mediated via differential phosphorylation (Ronchi et al., 1993), rather than…”
Control of Drosophila body pattern by the hunchback morphogen gradient. (1992, background): “Localized Kr, kni, and gt transcription is first observed during nuclear cycles 11 and 12 (Knipple et al., 1985; Nauber et al., 1988; Eldon and Pirrotta, 1991; Kraut and Levine, 1991a), arguing that graded hb protein is active at this time, if not earlier.”
Negative Regulation of Active Zone Assembly by a Newly Identified SR Protein Kinase (2009, background): “We, therefore, examined mutations in genes that could represent SRPK79D-dependent negative regulators of translation, such as aret (bru), cup, pum, nos, and sqd [38–44], reasoning that the loss of such a translational inhibitor might result in the ectopic synthesis of AZ proteins, ultimately leading”