An Analytical Method to Determine Tortuosity in Rechargeable Battery Electrodes

By B. Vijayaraghavan, D. Ely, Y. Chiang, R. García-García, R. García. 2012

135 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Automotive Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5d234ac70ef8b8ee5015f509a6a2dcd07d7c908d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Automotive Engineering

1. D. Brett
2. Bernhard Tjaden
3. M. Ebner
4. Vanessa Claire Wood
5. Paul R. Shearing
6. D. Chung

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

1. D. Brett
2. Bernhard Tjaden
3. Paul R. Shearing
4. M. Ebner
5. Vanessa Claire Wood
6. D. Chung

Citations in the corpus

• Validity of the Bruggeman relation for porous electrodes (2013, methodology): “) Following the analytical description of battery tortuosity by Vijayaraghavan et al [21], the inactive material tortuosity, τν , of an electrode is approximated using the Bruggeman relation, τν = −1/2 ν .”
• Tortuosity in electrochemical devices: a review of calculation approaches (2018, background): “Besides COMSOL Multiphysics [148, 149], researchers have calculated tortuosity using programmes, such as Cast3M [150] or custom made models, which focus on a specific electrochemical device, such as Batts3d [34, 56, 151].”