E pluribus unum: Dual identity and minority group members' motivation to engage in contact, as well as social change

By Demis E. Glasford, John F. Dovidio. 2011

95 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5d1d311609bb23787332cd8af4c665df391ee0d3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. John F. Dovidio
2. Tamar Saguy
3. Adam M. Grant

In Social Psychology

1. S. Gaertner
2. Adam R. Pearson
3. John F. Dovidio
4. Elze G. Ufkes
5. Tamar Saguy
6. Miles Hewstone
7. David M. Amodio
8. K. Kawakami

In Sociology and Political Science

1. John F. Dovidio
2. S. Gaertner
3. Adam R. Pearson
4. Tamar Saguy
5. Elze G. Ufkes
6. Gordon Hodson
7. David M. Amodio
8. Miles Hewstone

Citations in the corpus

• Included but Invisible? Subtle Bias, Common Identity, and the Darker Side of “We” (2016, background): “…facilitate willingness to take action for change Simon, Reichert, & Grabow, 2013; Simon & Ruhs, 2008), because this form of inclusion implies greater support for equality among members the majority group (Whites) and thus optimism about the prospects for social change (Glasford & Dovidio, 2011).”