Confined dense circumstellar material surrounding a regular type II supernova

By O. Yaron, D. Perley, A. Gal-yam, J. Groh, A. Horesh, Eran Ofek, Shrinivas R. Kulkarni, J. Sollerman, C. Fransson, A. Rubin and 24 more. Nature Physics, 2017

269 citations recorded by the source corpus.

With the advent of new wide-field, high-cadence optical transient surveys, our understanding of the diversity of core-collapse supernovae has grown tremendously in the last decade. However, the pre-supernova evolution of massive stars, which sets the physical backdrop to these violent events, is theoretically not well understood and difficult to probe observationally. Here we report the discovery of the supernova iPTF 13dqy = SN 2013fs a mere ∼3 h after explosion. Our rapid follow-up observations, which include multiwavelength photometry and extremely early (beginning at ∼6 h post-explosion) spectra, map the distribution of material in the immediate environment (≲1015 cm) of the exploding star and establish that it was surrounded by circumstellar material (CSM) that was ejected during the final ∼1 yr prior to explosion at a high rate, around 10−3 solar masses per year. The complete disappearance of flash-ionized emission lines within the first several days requires that the dense CSM be confined to within ≲1015 cm, consistent with radio non-detections at 70–100 days. The observations indicate that iPTF 13dqy was a regular type II supernova; thus, the finding that the probable red supergiant progenitor of this common explosion ejected material at a highly elevated rate just prior to its demise suggests that pre-supernova instabilities may be common among exploding massive stars. Type II supernova explosions are common, but our understanding of such events is not complete. Such an event was observed just three hours after the explosion started, providing important information about the early stages.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5d0551fb17461953aa3230d6a9d11fceb177b556

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. B. Metzger
  2. E. Berger
  3. Bing Zhang
  4. A. Piro
  5. Masaomi Tanaka
  6. J. Fuller
  7. E. Ramirez-Ruiz
  8. S. Valenti

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. J. Fuller
  2. A. Piro
  3. V. Morozova
  4. P. Mazzali
  5. S. Valenti
  6. Masaomi Tanaka
  7. Nozomu Tominaga
  8. K. Maeda

Citations in the corpus