Mobile phones and the evolution of social behaviour

By Laxmi Srivastava. Behavior and Information Technology, 2005

427 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5cffc676c5abb0710316489a89d861cf686ab0a5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

In Information Systems

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

The iPhone Effect (2016, background): “They provide an unrestricted sense of connection to wider social and organizational networks even when they are on “silent mode” and not in active use (Mazmanian, Orlikowski, & Yates, 2005; Plant, 2001; Srivastava, 2005).”
Can you connect with me now? How the presence of mobile communication technology influences face-to-face conversation quality (2013, background): “In a similar vein, an expanding body of qualitative research (e.g., Srivastava, 2005) suggests people form important and diverse kinds of connections to their personal devices.”
Needing to connect: The effect of self and others on young people's involvement with their mobile phones (2010, background): “Additionally, some mobile phone users report feeling loved and valued when they receive contact on their mobile phone (Walsh, White, & Young, 20098b) and that positive messages are stored (Srivastava, 2005).”
Mobile Telephony, Financial Inclusion and Inclusive Growth (2018, background): “Srivastava (2005) observes that the mobile phone has transitioned from an obvious “technological object” to a “social object”.”
The Extended iSelf: The Impact of iPhone Separation on Cognition, Emotion, and Physiology (2015, background): “This type of cell phone attachment and dependency gives users the impression that they are constantly connected to the world and therefore feel less alone (Srivastava, 2005).”
Me, my mobile, and I : the role of self- and prototypical identity influences in the prediction of mobile phone behavior (2007, background): “, Ling, 2000; Ozcan & Kocak, 2003) and is a form of identity expression (e.g., Carroll et al., 2002; Srivastava, 2005) for many users.”
A model of the relationship between psychological characteristics, mobile phone addiction and use of mobile phones by Taiwanese university female students (2012, background): “Because the reason why young people use mobile phones could be related to self identity, improving one’s status compared to peers, and enhancing a sense of security, entertainment, social relationships and interpersonal interaction (Ozcan & Kocak, 2003; Plant, 2000; Srivastava, 2005), this phenomeno”