Hyperons in neutron-star cores and a 2 M⊙ pulsar

By I. Bednarek, P. Haensel, J. Zdunik, Michal Bejger, R. Mańka. 2011

137 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Context. A recent measurement of the mass of PSR J1614-2230 rules out most existing models of the equation of state (EOS) of dense matter that is subjected to the high-density softening caused by either hyperonization or a phase transition to either quark matter or a boson condensate. Aims. We attempt to resolve the apparent differences between the predictions derived from up-to-date hypernuclear data, which in- clude the appearance of hyperons at about three nuclear densities and the existence of a M = 2.0 Mneutron star. Methods. We consider a non-linear relativistic mean field (RMF) model involving the baryon octet coupled to meson fields. An effective Lagrangian includes quartic terms in the meson fields. The values of the model parameters are obtained by fitting the semi- empirical parameters of nuclear matter at the saturation point, as well as potential wells for hyperons in nuclear matter and the strength of the Λ − Λ attraction in double-Λ hypernuclei. Results. We propose a non-linear RMF model that is consistent with up-to-date semi-empirical nuclear and hypernuclear data and allows for neutron stars with hyperon cores and M > 2 M� . The model involves hidden-strangeness scalar and vector mesons, coupled only to hyperons, and quartic terms involving vector meson fields. Conclusions. Our EOS involving hyperons is stiffer than the corresponding nucleonic EOS (in which hyperons are artificially sup- pressed) above five nuclear densities. The required stiffening is generated by the quartic terms involving the hidden-strangeness vector meson.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Geophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5cef18b4acda63178ebdbbc59c086dbce355fefb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. J. Zdunik
  2. P. Haensel
  3. A. Potekhin
  4. José A. Pons
  5. T. Birnstiel

In Geophysics

  1. J. Zdunik
  2. P. Haensel

Citations in the corpus