New Directions for Understanding Systemic Risk

By J. Kambhu, Scott T. Weidman, N. Krishnan. 2007

64 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Economies of contagion: financial crisis and pandemic (2013, background): “This conference brought together experts from the financial sector with those working within science, including biology (Kambhu et al., 2007; May et al., 2008).”
Supply chain disruption propagation: a systemic risk and normal accident theory perspective (2018, background): “Since that time, systemic risk has mainly applied to finance and economics, but given the complexity of many systems beyond economics, such as climate, biology and power systems, a more general theoretical development has emerged (Kambhu, Weidman, and Krishnan 2007).”
The Financial Stress Index: Identification of Systemic Risk Conditions (2011, unknown): “Similarly, Kambhu, Weidman, and Krishnan (2007)19 refer to systemic risk as a “tendency toward a rapid and large transition from one stable state to another, possibly less favorable, state.””
The (impossible) repo trinity: the political economy of repo markets (2016, background): “Everything changed with the 1998 Russian crisis (Kambhu et al., 2007).”