Modified Repeats: One Method for Asserting Primary Rights From Second Position
By Tanya Stivers. 2005
287 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5cd6747fe79af29ceb0131e825f0182566f1a6dd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Language and Linguistics
- Galina B. Bolden
- Zsuzsanna Fagyal
- Jeffrey D. Robinson
- Lorenza Mondada
- Andrea Golato
- Maurice Nevile
- Arnulf Deppermann
- Daniel M. K. Lam
In Literature and Literary Theory
- Galina B. Bolden
- Jeffrey D. Robinson
- Andrea Golato
- Zsuzsanna Fagyal
- Lorenza Mondada
- Daniel M. K. Lam
- Maurice Nevile
Citations in the corpus
- Displaying, contesting and negotiating epistemic authority in social interaction: Descriptions and questions in guided visits (2013, background): “A variety of epistemic expressions have been described in this respect, within interactional linguistics, such as ‘achso’ in German (Golato and Betz, 2008), ‘I think’ in Finnish (Kärkkäinen, 2003) or in English (Stivers, 2005), ‘I don’t know’ in a variety of languages (Beach and Metzger, 1997; Keeva”
- Comparing Single and Double Sayings of the German Response Token ja and the Role of Prosody: A Conversation Analytic Perspective (2008, background): “This study contributes to the growing body of work that has investigated how epistemic rights and authority are negotiated in discourse (Heritage & Raymond, 2005; Raymond & Heritage, 2006; Stivers, 2005).”
- ‘Articulating the unsaid’ via and-prefaced formulations of others’ talk (2010, background): “For a discussion of different ways to confirm what the other has said, see Stivers (2005).”
- Soliciting Accounts With Why-Interrogatives in Conversation (2011, background): “Responses to account solicitations as evidence for recipients’ orientations Next-turn position is a primary place where evidence of participants’ understandings of prior actions can be found (Heritage, 1984b).”