The economics of employment protection
By J. Addison, Paulino Teixeira. Social Science Research Network, 2001
336 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5cc6b7fef325127a29b1d20e044ff7ea6483b12d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- William R. Kerr
- Ramana Nanda
- John P. Martin
- S. Scarpetta
- Ricarda Schmidl
- Marco Caliendo
- Max Nathan
- Gilles Duranton
Citations in the corpus
- Youth unemployment and active labor market policies in Europe (2016, background): “, hiring policies, minimum wages, and youth unemployment levels (Addison and Teixeira 2003; Bertola et al. 2007; Jimeno and Rodríguez-Palenzuela 2003).”
- Job Security and Job Protection (2005, neutral): “This can be derived from the job security equation (1), as in equation (2).”
- Dismissal Protection and Worker Flows in Small Establishments (2007, neutral): “The available empirical evidence for the impact of employment protection legislation on employment stocks and flows, surveyed by Addison and Teixeira (2001), does not clearly support the theoretical predictions. A vast majority of the empirical literature follows Lazear (1990) in exploiting cross-co”
- Setting It Right: Employment Protection, Labour Reallocation and Productivity (2011, methodology): “But they are not without critics (see Addison and Teixeira 2003, for a review).”
- Financing Constraints and Entrepreneurship (2009, background): “2001, Addison and Teixeira 2003). Studies of entrepreneurial finance, however, show that stricter regulations reduce VC investment and high-growth entrepreneurship (Jeng and Wells 2000, Da Rin et al. 2006, Bozkaya and Kerr 2007). Autor et al. (2007) also find employment protections reduce entry rate”
- Employment Regulations Through the Eyes of Employers: Do They Matter and How Do Firms Respond to Them? (2004, neutral): “Moreover, by raising labor adjustment costs, employment protection may also reduce firms’ ability to cope with a rapidly changing global economy and take advantage of the opportunities offered by new technologies and access to new markets.”