Experiences from early stages of a national industrial symbiosis programme in the UK: determinants and coordination challenges
By M. Mirata. 2004
394 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Environmental Chemistry, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5cb725422d91373a73dfbab5e2e7a695e4fddba0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Environmental Chemistry
- Huiru Zhao
- Haoran Zhao
- Sen Guo
- Judith L. Walls
- Raymond L. Paquin
- Wouter Spekkink
- Han Shi
- Marian Chertow
In Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
- Frank Boons
- Judith L. Walls
- Raymond L. Paquin
- Han Shi
- Wouter Spekkink
- Huiru Zhao
- Haoran Zhao
- Sen Guo
In Strategy and Management
- Frank Boons
- Raymond L. Paquin
- Judith L. Walls
- Han Shi
- Wouter Spekkink
- Huiru Zhao
- Haoran Zhao
- Sen Guo
Citations in the corpus
- Evaluating the comprehensive benefit of eco-industrial parks by employing multi-criteria decision making approach for circular economy (2017, background): “…the development characteristics of eco-industrial parks, such as the United States (Gibbs and Deutz, 2005), Netherlands (Heeres et al., 2004), UK (Mirata, 2004), Japan (Van Berkel et al., 2009), Korea (Park et al., 2008; Behera et al., 2012), Brazil (Veiga and Magrini, 2009) and Egypt (Sakr et…”
- Industrial Symbiosis Dynamics and the Problem of Equivalence: Proposal for a Comparative Framework (2017, background): “In order to do so, we can distinguish technical, economic, geospatial, as well as social and institutional conditions (Gibbs 2003; Mirata 2004; BCSD-GM 1997).”
- Organizational Perspectives of Industrial Symbiosis (2015, background): “Champions are key individuals within IS systems with the ability and energy to push for and broaden IS participation among firms (Baas & Huisingh, 2008; Hewes & Lyons, 2008; Mirata, 2004) and to support managing specific exchanges (Behera et al., 2012).”
- Developing country experience with eco-industrial parks: a case study of the Tianjin Economic-Technological Development Area in China (2010, background): “In recent years a growing body of literature examining EIP/IS practice arose in North America [11–13], Europe [14–17] and Australia [18,19].”
- The dynamics of industrial symbiosis: A proposal for a conceptual framework based upon a comprehensive literature review (2011, background): “In the United Kingdom the influence of public policies is also evident, as a result of the NISP and policy waste management (Mirata, 2004; Phillips et al., 2006), but there it acts more as a facilitator, funding the activities of NISP.”
- Study of the performance of eco-industrial park development in China (2014, background): “, 2004), UK (Mirata, 2004), Japan (Van Berkel et al.”
- Waste management policies for industrial symbiosis development: case studies in European countries. (2010, background): “Although self-organisation is considered a more feasible strategy, some form of coordination can assist further IS development [8, 12, 16, 17].”
- Methodological Aspects of Applying Life Cycle Assessment to Industrial Symbioses (2012, neutral): “…Number 1 isting symbioses (Chertow 2007), planning new eco-industrial parks (EIPs) (Baas and Huisingh 2008; Gibbs and Deutz 2005; Heeres et al. 2004; Mirata 2004; Van Leeuwen et al. 2003; Veiga and Magrini 2009; Zhang et al. 2010), and even restructuring the whole nation into a circular economy…”