Empirical models of toxigenic Pseudo-nitzschia blooms: Potential use as a remote detection tool in the Santa Barbara Channel

91 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Predicting potentially toxigenic Pseudo-nitzschia blooms in the Chesapeake Bay (2010, methodology): “, 2009) and the Santa Barbara Channel (Anderson et al., 2009).”
The role of nutrients in regulation and promotion of harmful algal blooms in upwelling systems (2010, background): “In the California Current, attempts have also been made to link environmental conditions to domoic acid concentrations (Anderson et al., 2007, 2009) or to blooms of toxigenic Pseudo-nitzschia spp. (Lane et al., 2009).”
Pseudo-nitzschia (Bacillariophyceae) species, domoic acid and amnesic shellfish poisoning: revisiting previous paradigms (2012, methodology): “Deformed cells, characterized as ‘boomerang’ or ‘handle bar’ shaped, have also been found at depths of 150 m in the Santa Barbara Channel, California, USA, as well as in surface samples associated with toxic P. pseudodelicatissimacomplex species (C. Anderson, personal communication).”
Fusing Multi‐ and Hyperspectral Satellite Data for Harmful Algal Bloom Monitoring With Self‐Supervised and Hierarchical Deep Learning (2025, unknown): “In this region, statistical relationships between satellite ocean color observations and in situ phytoplankton counts, domoic acid particulates have been integrated into hydrodynamic models to map Pseudo-nitzchia HAB events (Seegers et al., 2015; C. R. Anderson et al., 2009, 2011).”