Trade liberalization, intermediate imputs and productivity

132 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Gains from Input Trade with Heterogeneous Importers (2018, methodology): “Amiti et al. (2017) use a related methodology to study the effect of China’s WTO entry on the U.”
The Surprisingly Swift Decline of U.S. Manufacturing Employment (2013, unknown): “imports from China had been subject to the relatively low NTR tari rates reserved for WTO members since 1980.(2) But for China, these low rates required annual renewals that were uncertain and politically contentious.”
Firm Response to Competitive Shocks: Evidence from China’s Minimum Wage Policy (2020, unknown): “In Column (3), a coefficient estimate b  = 1923 implies that for a 22% increase in the minimum wage [∆ ln = 02], a small low-wage firm at the 10% wage quantile ( = 1409) of the wage distribution increases its (log) average wage ln by 20.”
Does vertical specialisation increase productivity? (2017, unknown): “These compositional aspects may explain why country-specific and firm-level studies typically find larger effects (Amiti and Konings 2007; Blaum, Lelarge and Peters 2014).”
Imported Inputs and Productivity (2015, background): “For example, Amiti and Konings (2007) document that the productivity gain from cutting tariffs on intermediate goods are twice as big as those from comparable cuts for final goods in Indonesia.”