Percolation on complex networks: Theory and application

By Ming Li, Run-Ran Liu, Linyuan Lu, Maobin Hu, Shuqi Xu, Yi-Cheng Zhang. Physics reports, 2021

342 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract In the last two decades, network science has blossomed and influenced various fields, such as statistical physics, computer science, biology and sociology, from the perspective of the heterogeneous interaction patterns of components composing the complex systems. As a paradigm for random and semi-random connectivity, percolation model plays a key role in the development of network science and its applications. On the one hand, the concepts and analytical methods, such as the emergence of the giant cluster, the finite-size scaling, and the mean-field method, which are intimately related to the percolation theory, are employed to quantify and solve some core problems of networks. On the other hand, the insights into the percolation theory also facilitate the understanding of networked systems, such as robustness, epidemic spreading, vital node identification, and community detection. Meanwhile, network science also brings some new issues to the percolation theory itself, such as percolation of strong heterogeneous systems, topological transition of networks beyond pairwise interactions, and emergence of a giant cluster with mutual connections. So far, the percolation theory has already percolated into the researches of structure analysis and dynamic modeling in network science. Understanding the percolation theory should help the study of many fields in network science, including the still opening questions in the frontiers of networks, such as networks beyond pairwise interactions, temporal networks, and network of networks. The intention of this paper is to offer an overview of these applications, as well as the basic theory of percolation transition on network systems.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5ca0c0820f87ac0f6b55cc20cc91fd8d6f0451f8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. Manlio De Domenico
  2. Marco Grassia
  3. Filippo Radicchi
  4. Hernán A. Makse
  5. Giuseppe Mangioni
  6. J. P. Gleeson
  7. Oriol Artime
  8. Matjaz Perc

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

  1. Matjaz Perc
  2. Manlio De Domenico
  3. Marco Grassia
  4. Filippo Radicchi
  5. Hernán A. Makse
  6. Giuseppe Mangioni
  7. J. P. Gleeson
  8. Oriol Artime

Citations in the corpus