Ecology and Evolution of Cooperative Breeding in Birds: Mammals: comparisons and contrasts
By Andrew F. Russell. 2004
125 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5c8becb45d4e0a25e36873be955e2536091b470c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- T. H. Clutton-Brock
- M. Taborsky
- K. Kramer
- Nobuyuki Kutsukake
- Andrew F. Russell
- Dik Heg
- A. Bourke
- L. Brouwer
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- M. Taborsky
- Dik Heg
- K. Kramer
- T. H. Clutton-Brock
- L. Brouwer
- Andrew F. Russell
- Zina Bachar
- Nobuyuki Kutsukake
Citations in the corpus
- Large group size yields group stability in the cooperatively breeding cichlid Neolamprologus pulcher (2005, background): “…Allainé et al., 2000; Waterman, 2002), carnivores (Rood, 1990; Clutton-Brock et al., 2001b; Courchamp et al., 2002; Russell et al., 2002; see review Russell, 2004), and primates (e.g., Heymann & Soini, 1999; van Noordwijk & van Schaik, 1999), but not always (e.g., Rogovin et al., 2004; Seddon et…”
- Kin Selection and the Evolutionary Theory of Aging (2007, background): “Specifically, in these species, the fecundity of reproductives often increases rather than decreases, as Carey & Judge (2001) assume, owing to the presence of helpers [e.g., social insects (Wilson 1971), social mammals (Russell 2004)].”
- Cooperative breeding and its significance to the demographic success of humans. (2010, background): “Definition of the term cooperative breeding has undergone recent debate and reconsideration (Clutton-Brock 2006, Cockburn 1998, Russell 2004, Strassman & Kurapati 2010).”
- Effects of predation risk on foraging behaviour and group size: adaptations in a social cooperative species (2012, background): “In cooperative birds, inwhichmost of the research on the factors selecting for group living has been conducted (Ekman et al. 2004; Russell 2004), group size is generally predicted to increase with the relative costs of dispersing to breed independently owing to a lack of mates or territories of…”
- Aggression and submission reflect reproductive conflict between females in cooperatively breeding meerkats Suricata suricatta (2006, background): “Subordinate females suffer impaired fertility due to interferences by the dominant female, resulting in reproductive suppression (Creel and Creel 1991; Creel and Waser 1997; Faulkes and Abbott 1997; Moehlman and Hofer 1997; Schoech et al. 2004; Russell 2004).”