Constrained minimization methods
By E. Levitin, Boris Polyak. 1966
Subfields: Optimization & Training
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Optimization & Training
- Simon Lacoste-Julien
- Sebastian Pokutta
- Peter Richtárik
- Francis R. Bach
- Martin Jaggi
- Gauthier Gidel
- Jakub Konecný
- Fabian Pedregosa
Citations in the corpus
- Affine Invariant Analysis of Frank-Wolfe on Strongly Convex Sets (2020, methodology): “1 shows an affine invariant linear rate of convergence of FW, generalizing existing convergence results of Frank-Wolfe on strongly convex sets [Levitin et al. 1966; Demyanov et al. 1970; Dunn 1979].”
- Frank-Wolfe Algorithms for Saddle Point Problems (2016, background): “Frank-Wolfe for convex optimization over strongly convex sets has been studied by Levitin and Polyak (1966); Demyanov and Rubinov (1970) and Dunn (1979), amongst others.”
- On the Global Linear Convergence of Frank-Wolfe Optimization Variants (2015, methodology): “The early work of [23] showed linear convergence for strongly”
- Walking in the Shadow: A New Perspective on Descent Directions for Constrained Minimization (2020, methodology): “The vanilla Conditional Gradient method (CG) or the Frank-Wolfe algorithm (FW) [9, 12] has received a lot of interest from the ML community mainly because of its iteration complexity, tractability and sparsity of iterates.”
- Projection-Free Adaptive Gradients for Large-Scale Optimization (2020, methodology): “The Frank-Wolfe algorithm (FW) (Frank and Wolfe, 1956), a.k.a. conditional gradient algorithm (Levitin and Polyak, 1966), is a simple projection-free first-order algorithm for constrained minimization.”
- Newton-Kantorovich Method and Its Global Convergence (2006, unknown): “This result was obtained in [43]; for more details and examples, see [44, 45].”
- Interior-Point Gradient Method for Large-Scale Totally Nonnegative Least Squares Problems (2005, background): “Again, by substitution we calculate α = (e − u) Diag(x ◦ A Ax)(e − u) (e − u)T Diag(x)(AT A)Diag(x)(e − u) , (4) where Diag(x) is the diagonal matrix with the vector x on its diagonal (similarly for the other diagonal matrix), e is the vector of all ones, and ui = (A T b)i/(A T Ax)i.”
- Linear-Memory and Decomposition-Invariant Linearly Convergent Conditional Gradient Algorithm for Structured Polytopes (2016, methodology): “rder methods, e.g., the projected gradient method. It is known, already from the rst introduction of the method by Frank and Wolfe in the 1950’s [5], and the somewhat later work of Polyak and Levitin [20], that the method converges with a rate of roughly O(1=t) for minimizing a smooth convex functio”
- Outer approximation methods for solving variational inequalities in Hilbert space (2017, methodology): “This method appeared in the literature as the gradient projection method in the context of minimization and was introduced by Goldstein [8], and Levitin and Polyak [9].”
- Hybrid Steepest Descent Method for Variational Inequality Problem over the Fixed Point Set of Certain Quasi-nonexpansive Mappings (2005, background): “Several convergence analyses on (13) are found for example in Dolidze (1982), Goldstein (1964), Golshtein and Tretyakov (1996), Levitin and Polyak (1966), and Zeidler (1985, 1990).”
- On the linear convergence of the alternating direction method of multipliers (2012, unknown): “Popular choices for the ascent methods include (single) coordinate ascent (see [3,7,9,31,38,40,46,47,53]), gradient ascent (see [31,40,48]) and gradient projection [22,29].”