Responsible estuarine finfish stock enhancement: an Australian perspective
By M. D. Taylor, P. Palmer, D. Fielder, I. Suthers. 2005
84 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5c80f890f37e27722972d12eecac445a75317a02
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- Rochelle D. Seitz
- A. Hines
- R. Lipcius
- D. Eggleston
- Matthew W. Taylor
- D. Fielder
- I. Suthers
- S. Laffan
In Global and Planetary Change
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- Key habitat and home range of mulloway Argyrosomus japonicus in a south-east Australian estuary: finding the estuarine niche to optimise stocking (2006, background): “Success of previous mulloway enhancement attempts has been variable and limited to estuaries that have a large area of key habitat (discrete deep holes with bottom structure, Taylor et al. 2006).”
- Responsible genetic approach to stock restoration, sea ranching and stock enhancement of marine fishes and invertebrates (2017, background): “However, these cost-benefit analyses generally focus on economic returns and often do not consider environmental and genetic costs (e.g. Taylor et al. 2005).”
- The Chesapeake Bay Blue Crab (Callinectes sapidus): A Multidisciplinary Approach to Responsible Stock Replenishment (2008, background): “As also advocated in recent stock replenishment and marine conservation biology reviews (Svåsand et al., 2000; Lipcius et al., 2003, 2005b; Taylor et al., 2005; Bell et al., 2006; Obata et al., 2006), managing the blue crab fishery and establishing an effective stock restoration program must take…”