1. The Scientific Model of Causality

By James J. Heckman. 2005

273 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5c7104ecf6b405112b2d8d51185b4482ad25fd01

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Sociology and Political Science

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

Who benefits most from college? Evidence for negative selection in heterogeneous economic returns to higher education (2010, background): “…economic theory (Roy 1951) and has been extended and formalized for observational studies in statistics (e.g., Holland 1986; Rosenbaum and Rubin 1983, 1984; Rubin 1974), economics (e.g., Heckman 2005; Manski 1995), and sociology (e.g., Morgan and Winship 2007; Sobel 2000; Winship and Morgan 1999).”
3. The Foundations of Causal Inference (2010, methodology): “The “surgery definition” was used in Pearl (2000a, p. 417) and criticized by Cartwright (2007) and Heckman (2005); see Pearl (2009a:362–63, 374–79) for rebuttals. version of M, with the equation(s) of X replaced by X = x. Denote the solution for Y in the equations of Mx by the symbol YMx(u).”
Problems estimating the carbon Kuznets curve (2012, background): “10 This would be the Marshallian ceteris paribus change that assumes other variables constant [36, 37].”
TRYGVE HAAVELMO AND THE EMERGENCE OF CAUSAL CALCULUS (2014, unknown): “Angrist and Pischke (2010) represented the “experimentalist” position and Leamer (2010), Nevo and Whinston (2010), Keane (2010), and Sims (2010) defending the structural approach.”
Causal logics and mechanisms in policy design: How and why adopting a mechanistic perspective can improve policy design (2019, background): “This position is still valid and suggests that a solid theory of causation is needed to order and to explain policy dynamics and to understand, for example not only ‘what works and why’ (Goertz and Mahoney, 2012; Heckman, 2005; Jarvis, 2011) but also why a specific policy design, and indeed a specif”
What Would It Take to Change an Inference? Using Rubin’s Causal Model to Interpret the Robustness of Causal Inferences (2013, background): “In particular, schools that had approached SRA/McGraw-Hill prior to Borman et al.’s study may have had substantive reasons for believing OCR would work particularly well for them (e.g., Heckman, 2005).”
The Economics and Psychology of Personality Traits (2008, unknown): “Heckman (2005), and Heckman and Vytlacil (2007a) are recent discussions of this recurring issue.”
The Book of Why: The New Science of Cause and Effect† (2019, background): “In another direction, the concept of ﬁxing, developed by Heckman (2005) and Heckman and Pinto (2015), resembles, superﬁcially at least, the do operator that Pearl uses.”
Do CRM Systems Cause One-to-One Marketing Effectiveness? (2006, background): “For further discussion of the potential outcomes approach, refer to Angrist and Krueger (1999), Heckman (2005), Imbens (2004), Rosenbaum (2002), Rubin (2005) andWinship and Morgan (1999).”
Is regression adjustment supported by the Neyman model for causal inference (2007, methodology): “…(2006) demonstrates, however, that this reduced-form regression modeling approach may not conform to the non-parametric model of causal inference for estimating ATEs introduced by Neyman (1923) and developed in Rubin (1974,1978), Holland (1986), Heckman (2001,2005), and Heckman and Vytlacil (2006).”