Size and Power of Tests for Stationarity in Highly Autocorrelated Time Series
By Ulrich K. Müller. 2005
94 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Finance
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5c6ed09442b2750bcfb4150092b71d91e040a8e7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- S. Leybourne
- David I. Harvey
- Alan M. Taylor
- F. Busetti
- Dimitris Nicolas Politis
- L. Forni
- Efstathios Paparoditis
- Giuseppe Cavaliere
In Finance
- David I. Harvey
- S. Leybourne
- Dimitris Nicolas Politis
- Alan M. Taylor
- Efstathios Paparoditis
- F. Busetti
- Andrew S. Harvey
- F. Venditti
Citations in the corpus
- Convergence of Prices and Rates of Inflation (2006, unknown): “4 As shown in Muller (2005), a stationarity test will tend to reject the null hypothesis for highly persistent time series.”
- Inflation Convergence and Divergence within the European Monetary Union (2012, background): “(1992), henceforth KPSS, and Müller (2005). It is therefore important to distinguish between convergence and stability, the former analyzed by testing the null hypothesis of unit root, the latter by testing the null of stationarity.”
- The asymptotic size and power of the augmented Dickey–Fuller test for a unit root (2018, background): “In addition, Müller (2005, 2007) considered strongly autocorrelated time series and studied size and power properties of unit root tests in a local-to-unity asymptotic framework.”
- A simple, robust and powerful test of the trend hypothesis (2007, background): “Speci cally, in what follows we rede ne z0 := ̂ 0 s0 and z1 := ~ 0 s1 (13) with s0 := vuut!”