Beyond nature and nurture: The influence of lay gender theories on self-stereotyping
By Jill M. Coleman, Ying-yi Hong. 2008
125 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5c6a7089524c199aec0a7b98be1945c3fdf15f11
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
In Social Psychology
- T. Proulx
- Steven J. Heine
- Ilan Dar-Nimrod
- D. Sanchez
- K. Chaney
- Crystal L. Park
- Joseph A. Bulbulia
- Uffe Schjoedt
In Sociology and Political Science
- T. Proulx
- Steven J. Heine
- Ilan Dar-Nimrod
- D. Sanchez
- K. Chaney
- Joseph A. Bulbulia
- Uffe Schjoedt
- Crystal L. Park
Citations in the corpus
- Essentially Biased: Why People Are Fatalistic About Genes (2017, background): “Moreover, increased endorsement of biological over socialization explanations for gender is associated with greater self-identification with stereotypically-gendered traits (Coleman & Hong, 2008), in line with increased perceptions of the homogeneity of one’s own group.”
- Genetic Essentialism: On the Deceptive Determinism of DNA (2011, background): “Similarly, in another study, female participants read an article arguing either for a biological gender theory or a social gender theory (Coleman & Hong, 2008).”
- Gender-Inclusive Bathrooms Signal Fairness Across Identity Dimensions (2018, methodology): “Study 2 was identical to Study 1, though for generalizability, participants completed an alternative 10-item measure of perceived GE (Coleman & Hong, 2008), as they believed managers at the company would respond.”