A comparative assessment of DNA fingerprinting techniques (RAPD, ISSR, AFLP and SSR) in tetraploid potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) germplasm

By C. McGregor, C. Lambert, M. Greyling, J. Louw, L. Warnich. Euphytica, 2000

361 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Genetics, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5c6181517db967af57c71bfc0a0b39720230c45b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

1. M. Smulders
2. S. Şensoy
3. K. Abak
4. J. Trumble
5. S. Büyükalaca
6. A. Wünsch
7. Deguang Liu
8. J. Hormaza

In Plant Science

1. J. Trumble
2. S. Şensoy
3. K. Abak
4. S. Büyükalaca
5. A. Wünsch
6. J. Hormaza
7. J. Munyaneza

Citations in the corpus

• Phylogenetic relationships in Betula (Betulaceae) based on AFLP markers (2008, methodology): “We applied AFLP as an alternative, because AFLP generates polymorphic markers at a high frequency, has a high reproducibility, and has genome wide sampling and its markers are not under direct selection pressure (Jones et al. 1997; McGregor et al. 2000; Russell et al. 1997).”
• Fast and reliable strawberry cultivar identification using inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) amplification (2004, background): “In most of works, the number of polymorphic ISSR markers generated per primer is in the same order as for RAPDs (McGregor et al., 2000).”
• Evaluation of genetic diversity in Turkish melons (Cucumis melo L.) based on phenotypic characters and RAPD markers (2007, methodology): “…et al. 2001; Mliki et al. 2001; Decker-Walters et al. 2002; Lopez-Sese et al. 2002; Monforte et al. 2003; Zhuang et al. 2004) as well many other plant species (Al-Zahim et al. 1997; Horejsi and Staub 1999; Cansian and Echeverrigaray 2000; BrownGuedira et al. 2000; Mc Gregor et al. 2000).”
• Genetic analysis of some Egyptian rice genotypes using RAPD, SSR and AFLP (2005, methodology): “Similarly, Ferdinandez and Coulman (2002), Corazza-Munes et al. (2002), Archak et al. (2003) and McGregor et al. (2000) either compared the efficiency of RAPD, SSR and AFLP or used the different classes of markers for genotype identification.”
• Assessment of genetic diversity within and among Basmati and non-Basmati rice varieties using AFLP, ISSR and SSR markers (2004, result): “Comparison of average heterozygosity values highlights the high-level polymorphism generated by SSRs in comparison to AFLPs and ISSRs, which is in concurrence with the earlier reports in many plant species (Powell et al., 1996; Milbourne et al., 1997; McGregor et al., 2000).”
• Genetic differentiation between eastern populations and recent introductions of potato psyllid (Bactericera cockerelli) into western North America (2006, methodology): “The ISSR markers are used extensively in plant studies for assessing hybridization (Wolfe et al., 1998), for fingerprinting species, subspecies, or cultivars (Provan et al., 1996; Wolff & Morgan-Richards, 1998; McGregor et al., 2000), and for characterizing plant populations (Parsons et al., 1997).”
• Cultivar identification and genetic fingerprinting of temperate fruit tree species using DNA markers (2002, background): “Furthermore the high reproducibility of microsatellites compared to other markers (McGregor et al., 2000) allows confident exchange and standardisation of protocols among laboratories.”