On the welfare effects of competition for foreign direct investments

147 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Policy competition for foreign direct investment between asymmetric countries (2006, background): “The result that strong location advantages increase the bargaining power of potential host countries and may lead to taxation of FDI rather than subsidies, is also found in Haufler and Wooton (1999). However, they do not explore the welfare implications from location decision and investment policy.”
Multinational Firms: Easy Come, Easy Go? (2003, background): “2 For a (partial) review of this literature, see Haaland and Wooton (1999). Braunerhjelm et al.”
Competition for firms in an oligopolistic industry: The impact of economic integration (2010, background): “…provision of public goods and services in conjunction with a mobile workforce (Black and Hoyt, 1989); positive spillovers from employment in the host jurisdiction (Haaparanta, 1996; Davies, 2005); savings in trade costs (Haufler and Wooton, 1999); or technological backwardness (Fumagalli, 2003).”
Multinational corporations’ economic and human rights impacts on developing countries: a review and research agenda (2014, background): “An overview of the macrolevel economic impacts of FDI can be found in Borensztein et al. (1998); Ram and Zhang (2002); Fumagalli (2003); Clark et al. (2011).”