Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainable Finance
By Hao Liang, Luc Renneboog. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Economics and Finance, 2020
143 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) refers to the incorporation of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations into corporate management, financial decision-making, and investors’ portfolio decisions. Socially responsible firms are expected to internalize the externalities they create (e.g., pollution) and be accountable to shareholders and other stakeholders (employees, customers, suppliers, local communities, etc.). Rating agencies have developed firm-level measures of ESG performance that are widely used in the literature. However, these ratings show inconsistencies that result from the rating agencies’ preferences, weights of the constituting factors, and rating methodology. CSR also deals with sustainable, responsible, and impact investing. The return implications of investing in the stocks of socially responsible firms include the search for an EGS factor and the performance of SRI funds. SRI funds apply negative screening (exclusion of “sin” industries), positive screening, and activism through engagement or proxy voting. In this context, one wonders whether responsible investors are willing to trade off financial returns with a “moral” dividend (the return given up in exchange for an increase in utility driven by the knowledge that an investment is ethical). Related to the analysis of externalities and the ethical dimension of corporate decisions is the literature on green financing (the financing of environmentally friendly investment projects by means of green bonds) and on how to foster economic decarbonization as climate change affects financial markets and investor behavior.
Subfields: Finance, Marketing, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5c3cb6c3220d7895c6fec33342839a3d328f1be2
Citations in the corpus
- Green bonds as a tool against climate change? (2021, unknown): “9 First, large disagreement has been documented across major ESG rat- ing providers in their evaluation of firms' ESG performance (Berg, Fabisik, & Sauter, 2020; Liang & Renneboog, 2020).”