Potential energy functions for atomic-level simulations of water and organic and biomolecular systems.
By W. L. Jorgensen, Julian Tirado-Rives. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005
1,387 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Molecular Biology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5c2d6b39f43b616f66159432f65fba80cbb6c91c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Jianwei Wang
- R. James Kirkpatrick
- Sandeep Patel
- Charles L. Brooks III
- A. Kalinichev
- Richard Lavery
- F. Boas
- Pehr Harbury
In Molecular Biology
- Sandeep Patel
- Carlos Simmerling
- Charles L. Brooks III
- Robert Abel
- A. Kalinichev
- Richard Lavery
- F. Boas
- Pehr Harbury
Citations in the corpus
- Potential energy functions for protein design. (2007, methodology): “Previous reviews have described potential energy functions (PEFs) used for molecular mechanics simulations [1,2], protein design [3,4] and protein structure prediction [5].”
- Effects of substrate structure and composition on the structure, dynamics, and energetics of water at mineral surfaces: A molecular dynamics modeling study (2006, background): “For comprehensive comparisons between various existing models of water–water interaction see the many excellent recent reviews on the subject (Wallqvist and Mountain, 1999; Finney, 2001; Floris and Tani, 1999; Guillot, 2002; Jorgensen and Tirado-Rives, 2005).”
- Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters (2006, background): “4 In this report, we focus on the existing Amber fixed charge additive force fields.”
- Fluctuating charge force fields: recent developments and applications from small molecules to macromolecular biological systems (2006, background): “there will be continued development and increased use of polarizable force fields” [103]; furthermore, “.”