H.264/AVC over IP

By Stephan Wenger. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol., 2003

654 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Overview of the High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) Standard (2012, methodology): “In horizontal (Intra−Angular[10]) prediction, the boundary samples of the first column of the TB are modified such that half of the difference between”
H.264/AVC in wireless environments (2003, methodology): “RTP/UDP/IP stack (see [21]).”
Video coding with H.264/AVC: tools, performance, and complexity (2004, background): “In the following we briefly pres-ent different error resilience features included in the standard, for more details we refer to [24] and [7].”
Overview of the H.264/AVC video coding standard (2003, methodology): “For more details on the use of FMO, see [14].”
Study of Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of Video (2010, background): “Using one slice per frame has the advantage of reducing overhead due to IP headers, but at the expense of robustness [12].”
Standardized Extensions of High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) (2013, methodology): “The HEVC NAL unit design follows the same general principles as the AVC design, as described in [10], but has a different header length and contains some different syntax elements.”
Video Compression - From Concepts to the H.264/AVC Standard (2005, methodology): “For more details on the use of FMO, see [70]; concealment techniques for FMO are exemplified in [71].”