Who Owns the Future

By J. Lanier. 2013

460 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5c1df02aa5f485efa99ffad6d3e76b91f12cfd00

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Data colonialism through accumulation by dispossession: New metaphors for daily data (2015, unknown): “As Lanier puts it “The reason people click 'yes' is not that they understand what they're doing, but that that it is the only viable option other than boycotting a company in general, which is getting harder to do” (Lanier, 2014, 314).”
Big other: surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization (2015, unknown): “Eventually it became clear that Google ’ s business is the auction business, and its customers are advertisers (see useful discussions of this turning point in Auletta, 2009; Vaidhyanathan, 2011; and Lanier, 2013).”
Digital subjectivation and financial markets: Criticizing Social Studies of Finance with Lazzarato (2016, background): “This is the reason why Jaron Lanier (2014) proposes that ‘the siren server’ should pay everyone for the data they provide about themselves on the Internet.”
Human-Data Interaction: The Human Face of the Data-Driven Society (2014, background): “…2013) and marketplaces (Aperjis and Huberman, 2012), we believe that power in the system is presently disproportionately in favour of the data aggregators that act as brokers and mediators for users, causing the apparent downward trajectory of economic value in the information age (Lanier, 2013).”
Unlocking value for a circular economy through 3D printing: A research agenda (2017, methodology): “For a fully software mediated (Lanier, 2014) and toolless manufacturing process such as 3DP (Hague et al., 2003), unlockingmanufacturing value requires two prerequisites regarding (1) design and (2) supply chain and production.”
Governance of algorithms: options and limitations (2015, background): “Some have suggested introducing a machine tax to compensate for fiscal losses of automation and a data fee/tax to decrease the economic incentives for data collection (Lanier, 2013; Collin and Colin, 2013).”
Ethics of quantification: illumination, obfuscation and performative legitimation (2020, background): “As discussed in Saltelli (2020), a heterogeneous community increasingly perceives and indicts quanti ﬁ cation as instrumental to domination, including tech-nologists (Lanier, 2006), jurists (Supiot, 2007) and economists (Zuboff, 2019).”
The Blockchain as a Software Connector (2016, background): “This scenario is inspired by [14], which discusses an economy of micropayment based on the Web to compensate people for originally creative work they post on the Web.”