The Manipulation of Choice: Ethics and Libertarian Paternalism

By M. White. 2013

149 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5c18f1293ba0d6c4d2ab745bc2a357b91cef30d9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

From Libertarian Paternalism to Nudging—and Beyond (2015, background): “It must be noticed that even nudges who can foster the autonomy of most agents will decrease autonomy for some other individuals (White 2013).”
The ethics of nudging: An overview (2020, background): “Some critics worry that nudges are manipulative (Hausman & Welch, 2010; Mills, 2015; White, 2013; Wilkinson, 2013).”
Nudge Versus Boost: How Coherent are Policy and Theory? (2015, methodology): “By doing so, they improve the authenticity of a person's behavior and thus provide a practicable method of empowerment (White 2013, pp. 81–102; Sunstein 2014, pp. 123–42).”
Moving beyond the obsession with nudging individual behaviour: Towards a broader understanding of Behavioural Public Policy (2020, background): “As mentioned previously, nudges reflect ‘the behaviour [that policymakers’] want to see’ (White, 2013: 101) rather than engaging with citizens’ actual preferences in any meaningful way.”
Green nudges: Do they work? Are they ethical? (2016, background): “66 See Kahneman (2011). cognitive biases is disrespectful per se: people are being treated as mere means, not as ends (White, 2013: 135).”
The People’s Perspective on Libertarian-Paternalistic Policies (2018, background): “Critics argue that it is inappropriate for the government to influence the decision-making of individuals without their knowledge and consent (see, for example, Grüne-Yanoff 2012; Hansen and Jespersen 2013; Rebonato 2014; White 2013).”