Experimentation Standards for Crisis Informatics

By Fernando Diaz. 2014

5 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Sociology and Political Science, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

1. Alexandra Olteanu
2. Fernando Diaz
3. Carlos Castillo
4. Emre Kıcıman
5. Emre Kiciman
6. Muhammad Imran
7. Gabriella Kazai
8. Ricardo A. Baeza-Yates

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Alexandra Olteanu
2. Fernando Diaz
3. Carlos Castillo
4. Emre Kıcıman
5. Emre Kiciman
6. Gabriella Kazai
7. Ricardo A. Baeza-Yates
8. Muhammad Imran

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

1. Alexandra Olteanu
2. Fernando Diaz
3. Carlos Castillo
4. Emre Kıcıman
5. Emre Kiciman
6. Muhammad Imran

Citations in the corpus

• Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries (2019, background): “Another direction is to employ standardized evaluation protocols when testing new tools or methodologies (Diaz, 2014; Jurgens et al., 2015b).”
• A Critical Review of Online Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries (2018, background): “In addition, we discuss existing solutions aiming at correcting or accounting for biased or innacurate datasets, and existing recommendations for adequately evaluate and methods and observations (including the need for disclaimers and standards [6, 8]), or to interpret results in context [28, 30].”