Assessing the accuracy of spatial simulation models

By Paula Rogéria Lima Couto. 2003

62 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5c0c2a82f7c03dc46fc5605779047db2436673d9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. I. Vaughan
2. Canran Liu
3. S. J. Ormerod
4. G. Newell
5. Matt D. White

In Environmental Engineering

1. Lalit Kumar
2. I. Vaughan
3. Canran Liu
4. S. J. Ormerod
5. G. Newell
6. Matt D. White

In Global and Planetary Change

1. I. Vaughan
2. Canran Liu
3. S. J. Ormerod
4. G. Newell
5. Matt D. White

Citations in the corpus

• Revisiting Kappa to account for change in the accuracy assessment of land-use change models (2011, background): “assessments of simulation results (Turner et al., 1989; Couto, 2003), most of which compare simulated land-usemapswith actual landuse maps.”
• Measuring the accuracy of species distribution models: a review (2009, background): “Fielding and Bell (1997) reviewed some accuracy measures that can potentially be used in SDM. Couto (2003) reviewed some accuracy measures in the context of general spatial simulation models.”
• The continuing challenges of testing species distribution models (2005, background): “Finn (1993) and Couto (2003) describe a measure”
• Comparative assessment of the measures of thematic classification accuracy (2007, background): “(1999) thought this approach is less appropriate in relation to the map end-user, Foody (2002) and Couto (2003) showed interest in it since a broader range of problems can be tackled by using this approach and different weightings can be incorporated to show different importance for different errors”