Do public subsidies stimulate private R&D spending?

By Xulia González, Consuelo Pazó. 2008

585 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5c046d082ffe13551b3fca0e044584d0fc205651

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Do government grants promote innovation efficiency in China's high-tech industries? (2016, background): “Government grants (GG) González and Pazó (2008), Hu (2001), Hussinger (2008)”
Additionality or crowding-out? An overall evaluation of public R&D subsidy on private R&D expenditure (2016, background): “…study is no exception and follows this strand of literature, assessing the French R&D grant support system performing an “after the fact” analysis as in Almus and Czarnitzki (2003), Blanes and Busom (2004), Czarnitzki and Licht (2006), and González and Pazó (2008), Hussinger (2008), among others.”
Public R&D Policies and Private R&D Investment: A Survey of the Empirical Evidence (2015, methodology): “Applying a matching approach to the same dataset as González et al. (2005), González and Pazó (2008) moreover find that, similarly as for small firms, R&D subsidies are more effective for firms operating in low-tech sectors, which the authors argue is probably also due to the inducement effect.”
Demand-side vs. supply-side technology policies: Hidden treatment and new empirical evidence on the policy mix (2015, background): “Among others, González and Pazó (2008) indicate in a sample of Spanish manufacturing firms both the absence of the crowding-out effect and, under certain circumstances, the presence of complementarity.”
Subsidies or loans? Evaluating the impact of R&D support programmes (2017, methodology): “The variety of empirical methodologies used for this assessment is wide, including specific techniques to control for potential endogeneity of public support, nonlinearities and firm heterogeneity (Wallsten, 2000; Busom, 2000; Lach, 2002; Duguet, 2004; González et al., 2005; González and Pazó, 2008;”
Research and Development, Cash Flow, Agency and Governance: UK large companies (2012, background): “Guellec and Van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie (2003) found positive rather than negative effects except in the case of defence subsidies for 17 OECD countries; Gonzalez and Pazo (2008) found no indication of crowding out in the case of Spanish manufacturing firms.”
The link between public support and private r&d effort: what is the optimal subsidy? (2011, background): “7 González and Pazó 2008, Cerulli and Poti, 2010).”
R&D policy instruments – a critical review of what we do and don’t know (2016, background): “…concluding that there is no evidence of a “crowding out” effect and some evidence that, without public funds, firms would have invested significantly less of their own funds in R&D (e.g. Aerts and Schmidt 2008; González and Pazó 2008; Hussinger 2008; Clausen 2009; Czarnitzki and Bento 2012).”