Techniques for Plan Recognition
By Sandra Carberry. User modeling and user-adapted interaction, 2001
311 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, Signal Processing
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5bf7f3c0d4be124647c32052c1da0fcae43fe71c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Peter Stone
- Andrea Lockerd Thomaz
- Anthony David Jameson
- Stefano V. Albrecht
- Diane Joyce Cook
- Sarit Kraus
- Cynthia Lynn Breazeal
- Michael Mateas
In Computer Networks and Communications
- Michael Mateas
- Diane Joyce Cook
- Peter Stone
- Andrea Lockerd Thomaz
- Cynthia Lynn Breazeal
- Gal A. Kaminka
- Steven James Levine
- David N. Chin
In Signal Processing
- Michael Mateas
- A. Gertner
- Diane Joyce Cook
- Peter Stone
- Cristina Conati
- Kurt VanLehn
- Steven James Levine
- David N. Chin
Citations in the corpus
- Concurrent Plan Recognition and Execution for Human-Robot Teams (2014, background): “Numerous approaches to plan recognition have been proposed, as noted in (Carberry 2001).”
- A data mining approach to strategy prediction (2009, methodology): “At the strategic level, plan recognition has been applied to predicting an opponent’s actions, while various techniques have been applied to automatically learn domain knowledge.”
- Sensor-Based Activity Recognition (2012, background): “One thread of work is to map activity recognition to the plan recognition problem in the well-studied artificial intelligence field [109].”
- Ad Hoc Autonomous Agent Teams: Collaboration without Pre-Coordination (2010, background): “Intended plan recognition (in contrast to keyhole recognition) is the term used when the observed agent knows that it is being observed, and is acting under the constraints imposed by this knowledge (Carrbery 2001).”
- Adaptive interfaces and agents (2002, methodology): “An overview of uses of plan recognition in interactive systems is given by Carberry (2001).”
- Predictive Statistical Models for User Modeling (2001, unknown): “In particular, early plan recognition systems used handcrafted plan libraries to postulate a user's intentions or preferences from his/her utterances (Carberry, 2000).”
- Using perspective taking to learn from ambiguous demonstrations (2006, background): “In general, how to handle and resolve " misconceptions " is a significant issue in developing collaborative systems capable of goal inference and plan recognition [5].”
- Empirical Evaluation of User Models and User-Adapted Systems (2001, background): “For a review of plan recognition see Carberry (2001), for a review of mixed-initiative systems see Zukerman and Litman (2001) and for a review of user modeling in human-computer interaction see Fischer (2001).”
- Using Bayesian Networks to Manage Uncertainty in Student Modeling (2002, background): “Although knowledge assessment and plan recognition are thus strongly related, very little research in plan recognition has leveraged this connection (Jameson, 1996; Carberrry, 2001).”