A comparison of methods for testing differences in predictive ability

By H. R. Cederkvist, A. Aastveit, Tormod Næs. 2005

47 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Analytical Chemistry, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5be8c35d5475f5ba6cf8bb6353125ae0f61c43e3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Analytical Chemistry

1. Johan Trygg
2. Lennart Eriksson
3. Svante Wold
4. Robert Powers
5. Bradley Worley
6. Robert Sabatier
7. R. Joffre
8. Thomas Verron

In Statistics and Probability

1. Svante Wold
2. Johan Trygg
3. Lennart Eriksson
4. Robert Powers
5. Bradley Worley

Citations in the corpus

• CV‐ANOVA for significance testing of PLS and OPLS® models (2008, background): “Naes and co-workers [6–8] have shown that cross-validated residuals are relevant and work well in the context of ANOVA.”