Human error: models and management.

By J. Reason. British medical journal, 2000

1,456 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5be041196e178402769ececabd3734085ac3a2ce

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Performing ‘Initial Assessment’: Identifying the Latent Conditions for Error at the Front-Door of Local Authority Children's Services (2010, background): “James Reason (inter alia 1997, 2000), perhaps the most well known exponent of this standpoint, argues that errors in human systems have their origins ‘not so much in the perversity of human nature as in “upstream” systemic factors’ (Reason, 2000, p. 768).”
Construction safety and digital design: A review (2012, background): “wider set of organizational structures and practices led to individuals being put into unsafe situations; although recent work describes accidents resulting as multiple factors interact [51].”
Decision‐making under uncertainty in child protection: Creating a just and learning culture (2018, background): “Studies reveal how the individual worker is only one causal factor in a complex social and technological network in which there may be many ‘latent conditions’ for error – systemic factors that make error more likely (Reason, 2000).”
Difficult Airway Society 2015 guidelines for management of unanticipated difficult intubation in adults (2015, background): “be distilled into a single algorithm, and even the best anaesthetic teams supported by the best guidelines will still struggle to perform optimally if the systems in which they operate are flawed.(10) The 2015 guidelines acknowledge this.”
Detecting adverse events for patient safety research: a review of current methodologies (2003, background): “Based on Reason s [89] definition of human errors and Norman s cognitive theory of human action [90,91], a preliminary action-based cognitive taxonomy of medical errors has been developed that largely satisfies these four criteria [92].”