Controlling Shear Stress in 3D Bioprinting is a Key Factor to Balance Printing Resolution and Stem Cell Integrity

By A. Blaeser, D. D. Duarte Campos, Uta Puster, W. Richtering, Molly M. Stevens, H. Fischer. Advanced Healthcare Materials, 2016

683 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Biofabrication: A Guide to Technology and Terminology. (2017, background): “In particular, the use of high buoyant density liquids [99], sacrificial fugitive materials [100], or granular gels [50,101] as media into which bioinks are deposited is becoming a new exciting Box 1.”
Advances in engineering hydrogels (2017, methodology): “In addition, printing should be carried out under physiologically relevant conditions in order to ensure cell viability and phenotype maintenance (137).”
Current Status of Bioinks for Micro-Extrusion-Based 3D Bioprinting (2016, background): “Although in the above reported study no constructs could be fabricated due to the low viscosity of alginate, the effect of nozzle diameter and concentration on resolution were successfully established [71].”