Tree cavities in riverine forests: What determines their occurrence and use by hole-nesting passerines?

By J. Remm, A. Lõhmus, K. Remm. 2006

152 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5bccb00d9b5590669b99ae244e878ae6e163193a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. G. Möller
2. Tomasz A Wesolowski
3. S. Winter
4. F. Archaux
5. K. Martin

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Frédéric Gosselin
2. Tomasz A Wesolowski
3. Y. Paillet
4. F. Archaux

Citations in the corpus

• The Design of Artificial Nestboxes for the Study of Secondary Hole-Nesting Birds: A Review of Methodological Inconsistencies and Potential Biases (2010, background): “Consequently, secondary hole-nesters must rely upon natural tree cavities or unoccupied holes excavated by primary hole-nesters (Martin & Eadie 1999, Remm et al. 2006).”
• Lessons from long-term hole-nester studies in a primeval temperate forest (2007, background): “In such conditions, the nonexcavators do not presumably have much choice but to rely on woodpecker-made holes (e.g., Lohmus and Remm 2005; Remm et al. 2006).”
• The importance of excavators in hole-nesting communities: availability and use of natural tree holes in old mixed forests of western Canada (2007, unknown): “Thus, in old forest systems, the role of several critical ecological and environmental factors, such as food supply, predation and environmental conditions, may be just as – or more – important than hole availability in limiting hole-nester densities (Walankiewicz 1991; Wesołowski and Stawarczyk 199”
• Microhabitats in lowland beech forests as monitoring tool for nature conservation (2008, background): “Two correlations with woodpeckers are proved within the literature: Firstly, the number of cavities correlates with the number of forest birds, because many bird species breed in woodpecker cavities in following years after the cavity construction (Remm et al., 2006); and secondly, the number of woo”
• Influence of tree characteristics and forest management on tree microhabitats (2011, background): “In addition, larger trees appear to be more attractive to cavity builders because wood thickness provides buffered micro-climatic conditions inside the cavities for nesters (Boonman, 2000; Remm et al., 2006), although our analyses only partly confirmed this trend.”